Skip to content
Discover thrilling city adventures, urban exploration guide…

Will Different Countries Emulate Australia's Example in Restricting Online Networks for Under-16s?

The nation's decisive move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are moving toward similar bans.

  • Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be passed next year.
  • Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures on the table".
  • In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
  • In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
  • The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a good foundation," said the MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is largely occurring at the state level due to federal gridlock.

  • Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
  • Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
  • The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from various figures to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, additional countries are similarly taking action.

  • Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
  • Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations adopt a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "might backfire". The agency notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states internationally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.

By

Amanda Beck

An urban explorer and travel writer passionate about uncovering hidden gems in cities worldwide, with a background in architecture and photography.

Urban Roulette

Type to search articles.